|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOW
YAR’ADUA UNDERMINES DEMOCRACY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bottom
of page
By Emmanuel Onwubiko
Nigerians have witnessed some of the most despicable and atrocious
acts of betrayals from some elected political office holders at
all levels who have cross carpeted from the political parties that
catapulted them to their political offices to the so-called ruling
Peoples’ Democratic Party [PDP]. Unfortunately, the president
of the Federal Republic of Nigeria Alhaji Umaru Musa Yar’adua
has demonstrated beyond all reasonable doubts that he does not care
a hoot about the sensibilities and feelings of a cross section of
Nigerians who have persistently criticized the defection of these
political office holders from their original political platforms
that sponsored them to their current offices to the Peoples’
Democratic Party [PDP] in what has been described as ‘Bread
and Butter’ political prostitution. The implication of the
continuous drive by the Peoples’ Democratic Party to compel
by hook or crook all elected politicians from their original political
parties to the Peoples’ Democratic Party is that the current
administration from the top has a carefully coordinated plot to
foist on corporate Nigeria a one party state and ultimately lead
Nigeria to fascism or totalitarianism.
Unfortunately, the majority of Nigerians who stood in the sun in
some of these states like Bauchi, Kebbi, Zamfara and Imo in 2007
to cast their votes for some of these highly unprincipled politicians
to become Governors of these States are yet to mobilize themselves
and demonstrate against these acts of betrayals and treacherous
abandonment of the mandates of these electorates. Although some
of these State Governors who have crossed over to Peoples’
Democratic Party like that of Imo State is believed strongly not
to have won the election but was foisted on the people by the Maurice
Iwu-led Independent National Electoral Commission who turned out
as the most beneficiary of that contraption that was put up in the
name of 2007 election in Imo State which produced Ikedi Ohakim,
a man described rightly as an unknown political quantity prior to
that so-called election which took place after the first Governorship
and house of Assembly polls had taken place and the Governorship
election results were annulled by the electoral commission illegally
even while the results of the State House of Assembly election that
took place simultaneously with that of the Governorship was left
intact. Iwu’s brother was made the Secretary to the Imo State
Government by Ohakim even as his daughter and son in-law bagged
juicy appointments in the same administration.
The political environment of Nigeria is truly oozing with stench
of tyranny and treachery made manifest through the ongoing arms
twisting of these elected political office holders by President
Umaru Musa Yar’adua-led Peoples’ Democratic Party to
abandon their parties to embrace the Peoples’ Democratic Party
and if care is not taken, Nigeria will sooner than later witness
unprecedented social anarchy because if the people are forced against
their will to illegally cross over to a particular party and that
party uses its hold on power to retain the same category of unpopular
and unprincipled politicians, then Democracy will be imperilled
and headed for destruction. Is this what and where President Umaru
Musa Yar’adua wants to lead Nigeria to? Why will a man who
has turned out as Nigeria’s first so-called University trained
Executive President participate in a scheme whose aim is to truncate
and undermine Democracy? Is it that a person’s university
degree does not help to shape the outlook or world view of the holder
so much so that what matters is serving ones’ partisan interest
above national interest as is being witnessed now with the wind
of cross carpeting blowing across Nigeria under President Yar’adua
where political office holders including elected legislators who
are clearly banned by the constitution from abandoning their political
platforms are moving massively to the Peoples’ Democratic
Party, a party that has not delivered the democratic entitlements
to Nigerians over the last decade?
Those who have lazily argued that these set of politicians who are
crossing over to the Peoples’ Democratic Party have the human
rights to so make their choice of the political association to belong,
are dead wrong. It is immoral, illegal and unconstitutional for
political office holders propelled and sponsored into offices by
a particular political platform to midway into their tenure to abandon
that party for the party in power at the Federal level for their
selfish reasons. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria
clearly recognizes that candidates for political offices must be
sponsored by particular political parties and going by the Supreme
Court Judgment on the Rotimi Amaechi’s matter versus Celestine
Omehia, it is clear that political parties that sponsor a candidate
is ultimately sacrosanct. These set of unprincipled politicians
have often pointed to the Supreme Court’s judgment that ruled
that the then Vice President Atiku Abubakar could not be dismissed
by the then President Obasanjo on the ground of abandonment of his
original political platform for the newly formed Action Congress.
But the case of Atiku versus the former president was different
in form, shape and dimension with that of Rotimi Amaechi who was
returned by the supreme court as the rightful candidate of the party
that sponsored him because Atiku was de-registered by his political
party through a deliberate scheme hatched by the then president
to deny him a platform to contest the 2007 election because he [Atiku]
kicked against the third term plot by the then president Obasanjo.
Amaechi was substituted.
Thomas M. Franck in his piece titled LEGITIMACY AND THE DEMOCRATIC
ENTITLEMENT carried as chapter one of the widely acclaimed political
book titled ‘Democratic Governance and International Law’
co-edited by Gregory H. Fox and Brad R. Roth, warned that if such
political misbehaviours like cross carpeting and abandoning the
platforms and still clinging on to the mandates of the people illegally
could spell doom for that nation involved. He wrote thus; ‘’In
the World that emerged after the collapse of the fascist and communist
ideologies, the principal cause of war has become unfairness and
anomie. How the means of a good life are distributed among peoples
and persons and whether people and persons are adequately consulted
in the decisions that determine their life-prospects; these are
the principal determinants of war and peace’’. How will
these unprincipled executive defectors in these states explain to
the electorate that they decided to abandon the political platforms
that brought them to power and under which they canvassed for votes
with solemn pledges to execute the programmes of these political
parties meant to better the respective States? It’s shameful.
+Onwubiko heads the Human Rights Writers’ Association of Nigeria.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAN NLC BARK AND BITE?
By Emmanuel onwubiko
The Nigerian Labour Congress [NLC] has carved a niche for itself over
the years as one of the few credible voices that represent the interest
of not only the Nigerian working class but the large army of impoverished
and pauperised citizenry. During the dark days of civilian dictatorship
of Olusegun Obasanjo from 1999 to 2007 when he was forced to abandon his
unconstitutional tenure extension, the Nigerian Labour Congress headed
then by a charismatic man, Adams Oshiomhole was at the forefront of series
of peaceful but effective agitations for the implementation of policies
that are pro-poor and targeted at ameliorating the high cost of living.
Though the then civilian tyrant Olusegun Obasanjo used everything available
to him in his arsenal including the Nigeria Police to seek to crush the
voices of opposition to his grand misrule but the leadership of the Nigerian
Labour Congress did not give up the popular struggle even as the greater
population of ordinary Nigerians showed greater loyalty and followership
to those popular agitations because they were by and large meant to liberate
the impoverished and endangered populace and more so when most people
realised that Adams Oshiomhole could have comfortably compromised with
the then corrupt political leadership to perpetuate the reign of civilian
dictatorship including the churning out of very unpopular and anti-poor
policies like the frequent hike in the pump price of premium motor spirit.
But Adams Oshiomhole who due to dint of hard work has successfully liberated
himself from the clutches of poverty still refused to compromised with
the reactionary forces in the Federal Government and ensured that the
body of the labour movement gave the then civilian dictators headed by
Chief Obasanjo the fight for their money. It is a fact that the then President
even sought to disband the Nigerian Labour Congress and did everything
under the sun to destabilize the Nigerian Labour Congress by registering
another labour platform-the trade Union Congress but little did he know
that even those that championed the creation of another autonomous platform
for workers in the higher echelon were united with the leadership of the
Nigerian Labour Congress to fight to better the overall living condition
of the Nigerian workers and Nigerians in general so Olusegun Obasanjo’s
divide and rule politics within the labour family did not click. Olusegun
Obasanjo deployed the services of one of Nigeria’s best legal minds
Chief Afe Babalola, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria to use legal means to
stop the organized labour from truncating his unpopular anti-people policy
of deregulation of the oil sector which simply means increase in the pump
price of petroleum products. Obasanjo found a ready ally in the person
of the then Chief Judge of the Federal High Court Justice Roseline Ukeje
who gave a highly controversial judgement annulling the power of the Nigerian
Labour Congress to call out her members on strike to protest unfriendly
Government policies.
The regime of Comrade Adams Oshiomhole as the Labour leader in Nigeria
was indeed eventful. It is the thinking of most analysts that the Nigerian
Labour Congress under the last dispensation met substantially the mission
statement of the labour movement which in summary is to organize and unionise
and educate all categories of the Nigerian workers, defend and advance
the political, economic, social and cultural rights of Nigerian workers;
emancipate and unite Nigerian workers and people from all forms of exploitation
and discrimination, achieve gender justice in the work place and in Nigerian
Labour Congress, strengthen and deepen the ties and connections between
Nigerian workers and the mutual/natural allies in and outside Nigeria
and to lead the struggle for the transformation of Nigeria into a just,
humane and democratic society. Abdulwaheed Omar assumed the leadership
of the Nigerian Labour Congress at the threshold of Nigeria’s transition
from one civilian rule to another and it is the expectation of Nigerians
that he should drive the labour movement to greater height because of
the fact that he took over from a man who made a mark in the memories
of Nigerians and succeeded in making the Nigerian Labour Congress a house
hold name in the minds and hearts of most analytical and rational Nigerians.
It is true that every leader has his own style but leading the Nigerian
Labour Congress is a big and highly demanding job that requires charisma
and the ability to mobilize the entire membership of the labour movement
and the organized civil society sector including the ordinary Nigerians
to achieve good governance and a transparent and accountable leadership
in Nigeria. This gentleman Comrade Waheed Omar has been around in the
Labour movement for decades and his assumption of the Nigerian Labour
Union’s hierarchy was greeted with greater optimism that the vibrancy
and the independent -mindedness that the labour movement has been known
over the years would not be compromised under his watch. To a great extent,
Comrade Omar has not disappointed Nigerians only that he needs to be much
more forceful in pushing the popular position of the Nigerian people in
matters like deregulation of the oil sector and the issue of electoral
reforms and the promotion of respect for Human Rights of Nigerians. Comrade
Omar has successfully waged a battle to compel the current Government
to reverse a hugely unpopular hike in the pump price of petroleum products.
But the battle ahead of the Nigerian Labour Congress is monumental and
the leadership are expected to remain resolutely in the pursuit of the
policies and programmes that will promote the human rights of all Nigerians
and the interest of the Nigerian workers. The warning by the Nigerian
Labour Congress to begin peaceful public rallies today to call for electoral
reforms and for the rise in the salaries and wages of the Nigerian workers
from the current unfortunate slave wage to a more acceptable living wage
of N52 thousand Naira must be followed to its logical conclusion. The
leadership of the Nigerian Labour Congress must not allow themselves to
be hoodwink into believing those sweet stories by the Nigeria’s
labour minister Adetokunbo Kayode to the effect that the Federal Government
will meet the demands of the Nigerian Labour Congress. My question to
Adetokunbo Kayode is that how does he want anybody to believe him that
the Government will meet the demands of the Nigerian Labour Congress and
that the current President is a listening one when it is clear that the
Federal Government has already rubbished the Justice Muhammadu Lawal Uwais-led
Electoral reform panel’s recommendations? Aluta continua, Victoria
asserta.
+Emmanuel Onwubiko heads the Human Rights Writers’ Association of
Nigeria. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOKO HARAM AND THE BLAME GAME
BY EMMANUEL ONWUBIKO
The closing week of last month for most Nigerians who live and do their
legitimate businesses in the North Eastern states of Bauchi, Yobe, Maiduguri
and even the North Western states of Katsina, Kano and Sokoto, will
remain one of the worst in their lives because of the sectarian religious
unrests masterminded by a self styled Islamic fundamentalist group known
as BOKO HARAM [Western Education is evil] or the Nigerian Taliban headed
by the now allegedly ‘assassinated’ leader MOHAMMED YUSUF.
Although most people who live in the Northern parts of Nigeria have
witnessed several bloody religious and ethnic conflicts in the past
years especially since the re-emergence of civil rule in 1999, but the
recent clashes between the followers of the so-called BOKO HARAM Islamic
sect and the Nigerian security agents including the Police, and the
Nigerian military was unprecedented in scope, scale and levels of casualties
and for the first time in recent years, members of the different security
agencies have engaged themselves in the game of blaming each other for
neglecting earlier intelligence on the activities of the BOKO HARAM
which has now led to the open bloody confrontation that has left over
seven hundred persons dead including an undetermined number of police
and military operatives.
The first Human Rights organizations based in Nigeria to react to the
recent crises in parts of Northern Nigeria was the Human Rights Writers’
Association of Nigeria, HURIWA, which blamed the failure of hard intelligence
for the unprecedented scale of clashes between the security agents and
the followers of the extremist Islamic sect- BOKO HARAM. The Rights
group had stated emphatically that if the operatives in the State Security
Service [SSS] and the Police had taken their intelligence gathering
jobs seriously, they would have been able to nip in the bud the violence
that enveloped most parts of Northern Nigeria for nearly a week which
led to a very high and unacceptable casualties especially on the part
of the so-called BOKO HARAM members who were initially said to be armed
with locally fabricated weapons. Subsequently, some members of the lower
chamber of the National Assembly also blamed intelligence failure for
the unrests. As expected, those concerned with intelligence gathering
jobs in the State Security Service [SSS] were cleverly exonerated of
any blame by no other person but the President, Umaru Musa Yar’adua
who stated that the activities of the Islamic fundamentalist group BOKO
HARAM had come under surveillance for a very long period of time even
as he gave his blessing for the military to crush the members of the
sect ruthlessly.
The president spoke with the State House media crew at the Nnamdi Azikiwe
International Airport on his way to Brazil even as violence continued
in parts of Northern Nigeria as if to say he was perfectly demonstrating
the story told of a ‘man who literarily chased rats while his
house burns’. President Umaru Musa Yar’adua, had stated
thus; ‘’our security agencies have been tracking them for
years. The operation we have launched now will contain them once and
for all. We are going to continue with the security surveillance all
over the Northern States to fish out any remnants of these elements
and deal with them SQUARELY AND PROMPTLY. I want to assure the people
of this country that peace and security of lives and properties will
be fully guaranteed’’. But what is the essence of security
surveillance if the attackers are not stopped before they struck? Secondly,
I am shocked at the high rate of killings that took place during the
clashes in Maiduguri, Borno State and the reported extra-judicial execution
of MOHAMMED YUSUF and the lead financier of Boko Haram – Alhaji
Buji Fai said to be a former commissioner of religious Affairs. There
must be a judicial commission of inquiry to determine the remote and
immediate causes of the violence in parts of the North even as the judicial
commission should be empowered to unravel the circumstances that led
to the death by controversial means of the two leaders of the Boko Haram
who were allegedly captured alive before they were killed by the Nigeria
police. If indeed these two high ranking leaders of the violent religious
sect were gunned down by the police after being captured alive as being
alleged, then those responsible for the dastardly act of extra-legal
execution must be named and prosecuted for murder because the members
of the Armed forces and police in Nigeria are under obligation to respect
the provisions of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria
which in several sections clearly outlawed extra-judicial executions.
Section 33[1] of the 1999 constitution states that; ‘’Every
person has a right to life, and no one shall be deprived intentionally
of his life, save in the execution of the sentence of a court in respect
of a criminal offence of which he has been found guilty in Nigeria’’.
The import of this provision means that extra-legal and summary execution
of suspects in police custody is illegal, unconstitutional and security
operatives guilty of such heinous crime must face the wrath of the law
in line with the spirit and principle of the RULE OF LAW. Section 36
[5] provides that every person charged with a criminal offence shall
be presumed to be innocent until he is proved guilty. If it is found
that the sectarian leaders were captured alive and executed by the police,
then the culprits must be fished out and prosecuted. This is the best
way to restore hope in the system and re-assure members of the civilized
world that Nigeria truly respects the principle of RULE OF LAW and not
THE PRINCIPLE OF RULE OF BRUTE FORCE. In quelling the uprising, was
excessive military force used? Nigerians demand an answer.
On the ongoing blame game, the States Security Service[SSS] told the
Senate of the Federal republic of Nigeria that it prepared several detailed
intelligence reports on the activities of Mohammed Yusuf and his Boko
Haram sect long before the violent uprisings in parts of the North and
that it forwarded same to relevant action agencies like the Police and
the office of the National Security Adviser to the President but unfortunately
no action was taken to arrest these dangerous religious extremists.
The question is why would the State Security Service wait for the police
to take action? Is it not the same SSS that arrest journalists arbitrarily?
Heads must roll because of this spectacular failure of intelligence.
Nigerians are waiting.
+Onwubiko heads the Human Rights Writers’ Association of Nigeria.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
BETWEEN KIDNAPPERS AND PRESIDENT YAR’ADUA
BY EMMANUEL ONWUBIKO
Nigerians are confronted by two fundamental problems namely the
threats posed by dare-devil, well armed kidnappers and the seemingly
inept leadership style of President Umaru Musa Yar’adua. Of
these twin problems one can easily be changed and the other has
to be frontally battled before the nation can overcome it. The problem
that can easily be positively transformed for the betterment of
us all is the seemingly inept leadership style of our President
Alhaji Umaru Musa Yar’adua either by himself or by Nigerians
through legal means of vote-of-no-confidence at the 2011 Presidential
election, that is if the electoral system is changed such that the
popular will of the electorate will be reflected in the election
results to be announced by the Independent National Electoral Commission
during the election of 2011 or if he [President Umaru Musa Yar’adua]
truly wants to serve Nigerians democratically for another tenure
after his first tumultuous and uneventful tenure in 2011, then he
has between now and next year to demonstrate his practical resolve
to give Nigeria and Nigerians, effective, result-oriented and transparent,
accountable leadership style which are the hallmarks of Good Governance.
The President must work with the organized civil society and other
patriotic Nigerians who are truly determined to lift Nigeria out
of her current status in the international community as a near-failed
State. Abiodun Adeniyi my professional colleague who just bagged
a Doctorate Degree in International Communication from the prestigious
University of Leeds, United Kingdom, the same school attended by
our own Professor Wole Soyinka, believes that President Umaru Musa
Yar’adua has the capacity to transform Nigeria for the better.
Before coming to the second problem confronting Nigerians and Nigeria
which is KIDNAPPING, let me fully exhaust the topic of how the current
federal administration can change the fortune of Nigerians and guarantee
maximum security, welfare and well-being of citizens and global
citizens resident in Nigeria because the provision of security of
lives and property of Nigerians is the most fundamental principle
of state policy as enshrined in the constitution of the federal
Republic of Nigeria.
The current Federal administration must immediately reorganize the
Nigeria Police for greater efficiency and effectiveness in crime
detection, prevention and fight. The hierarchy of the Nigeria police
ought to be led by a competent, well qualified and battle ready
Inspector General of Police who is ready and willing to implement
result-oriented and Human Rights compliant crime fighting mechanisms
to rescue Nigeria from the threat of annihilation posed by several
well organized gangs of crime syndicates- armed robbers, pen robbers
that is those political office holders who have become adept at
looting the public treasury and have effectively worked out modalities
for evading arrest and prosecution by the various law enforcement
agencies like the Nigeria Police, the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission [EFCC], and the Independent Corrupt Practices and allied
offences commission [ICPC]. Similarly, the various police formations
across the thirty six states and the federal capital of Abuja must
be led by competent and equally well equipped and motivated commissioners
of police who will as much as possible remain incorruptible and
above the influence of local politics. Secondly, the decision by
the Federal ministry of Labour to work out the framework for the
legislation of a national policy on social welfare scheme in the
country must go beyond the usual pattern of mere sloganeering and
inauguration of committees made up essentially of the same old persons
that are largely responsible for the impoverishment of Nigerians
through their incompetent and corrupt styles while they were in
Government. Adetokunbo Kayode, a lawyer, should appreciate the universal
fact that the best social policy that any Government can implement
so as to pragmatically and practically solve the developmental challenges
confronting Nigeria and Nigerians is the enforcement of the provisions
enshrined in Chapter Two of 1999 constitution. All that this Government
should do is to mount pressure on the National Assembly to amend
relevant sections of the extant constitution to make these good
Provisions in Chapter two of the constitution legally enforceable.
Most Nigerians are of the view that setting up another national
committee to work out a national social welfare policy will amount
to waste of public funds in pursuit of unrealistic goal. It is a
fact that unemployment is a major problem in Nigeria and the fundamental
cause of this terrible social problem is the failure of Nigeria’s
social infrastructure of Electricity power. How do we explain to
members of the international community that Nigeria’s textile
industry has collapsed largely due to the lack of political will
on the part of the political leadership to implement policies that
will protect the local textile industry and promote greater patronage
of the end products of these local textile mills by Nigerians and
foreigners alike? The current administration must revive the textile
industry in Nigeria as the first necessary step for revamping Nigeria’s
rapidly collapsing economy and to provide the much needed enabling
environment for the creation of employment opportunities for Nigerians.
The next critical economic problem that needs to be tackled is the
declining productivity of the nation’s agricultural industry
due largely to a combination of factors like lack of basic infrastructure
of electricity power, good roads, good storage facilities and the
needed land reforms, micro-credit schemes that will empower the
rural farmers to mechanize and expand their agricultural activities
because a nation that cannot feed her increasingly large army of
hungry citizens has failed in its fundamental duty of food security
and is simply sitting on a time bomb which will inevitably explode
in no distant time. How can we effectively manage a revolution to
be staged by say forty million hungry and unemployed Nigerians if
these set of Nigerians decide to take their destiny in their hands
and rally round to demand equity and social justice? The World Bank
recently told us that forty million Nigerians are unemployed and
if for the purpose of drawing a workable inference, if this forty
million Nigerians decide to say enough is enough and stream out
massively on the streets of Nigeria to demand that decent jobs be
provided for them by all relevant stakeholders, I am sure that the
entire army of the world cannot defeat them. This Government must
therefore tackle this hydra headed monster before we are all consumed.
If these and several other problems are tackled, then kidnapping
will be successfully resolved.
+EMANUEL ONWUBIKO heads Human Rights Writers’ Association
of Nigeria. Read
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
©Copy
right 2008 Human Rights Writers Association of
Nigeria.
Powered by: Abison World of Creative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|